The Book Mine Set

Book discussion blog with a Canadian bias.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada

I've lived North of 60 for 10 years, I have 1 wife, 2 kids, and 1,245,607 books tbr.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Reader's Diary #473- Lucy Maud Montgomery: Anne of Green Gables

Whew, I've reached book 13 for the Canadian Book Challenge, finally having read a book from each province and territory. I can now admit that I didn't want to use Montgomery for this challenge. While I recognize its place in Canadian literature, I really wanted to give another P.E.I. writer some recognition for a change. But, since I've been reading chapter books to my daughter lately, it was hard to avoid this one.

I'm glad I finally gave in. It turns out, to my surprise, that I'd not read the original before. I'd seen the movie and I now assume the version I'd read before, not as long and not nearly as great, was a condensed version.

It wasn't an easy book to read to a five year old, but it was worth the extra effort. As those of you who've read it know, Anne uses a LOT of big words. That, however, was just one reason the book encouraged a lot of conversations. Times have changed and wow, was Anne ahead of her time. In religion, artistic expression, and a whole lot more, my daughter and I found ourselves agreeing with Anne more than the adults around her. Importantly, she wasn't perfect. She was shallow about her red hair and her inability to forgive Gilbert Blythe was terrible. However, in doing so, Montgomery created a much more believable character, and I think it made Anne even more likable in the end.

I wasn't crazy about all the floral descriptions in the book, but that's more of a personal complaint. I don't have a green thumb at all, nor much an interest in botany. However, I'm sure many gardeners and plant enthusiasts, who would know these plants by name, would have found them described beautifully. They certainly didn't get in the way of our overall enjoyment.

Labels: , ,

Blogger Allison said...

I'm partial to Anne of Avonlea, but I do hold a soft spot for Anne of Green Gables as well. Such a big part of my life going up was that series. I remember it being a bit of a tough read too.

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Teddy Rose said...

Congrats on finishing the challenge!

That's wonderful that you read it with your daughter even if she didn't understand all of it!

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Historia said...

Congrats on finishing.
But you said you did 13 books.
The sidebar says you did 31 books!!! So which was it?

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Chris said...

Yay! Glad you liked Anne. I always wonder if guys will like it as much as girls do.

I've really fallen behind on the challenge but I haven't given up yet.

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I recall reading Anne of Green Gables many years ago, but somehow it always felt like more of read it because it is good for you book. I should try it again, perhaps.

Well done on finishing the challenge months ahead of time. I am going to request an extra year to complete mine.

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Anne: I'm open to reading more in the series now for sure.

Teddy: With some help (and I swear it didn't seem like a chore at all), I think she understood most. She certainly liked it.

Historia: How astute of you! Yes, it is actually 31. As you know, I've been reading books from each province and territory for the challenge, but I've also read a lot more Canadian books in the same time frame. I didn't want to include them until I had one book from all provinces/territories read first. Now I've gone back and counted the rest.

Chris: Well, I'm not your average guy ;) And don't give up on the challenge!

Barbara: Yeah, the "you should read it" thing probably made me hold off too-- that, and I thought I already had!

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

I love together reads — glad to hear you enjoyed this one with your daughter.

One from each province, I should really try to branch out more with my reading selections. Maybe for the 3rd Canadian Challenge...

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger C. B. James said...

I think it's good for people to read books that confuse them sometimes. Figuring things out can be half the fun.

I've left an award for you on my blog at

http://readywhenyouarecb.blogspot.com/2009/03/cb-wins-new-award.html

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  

Monday, March 30, 2009

Reader's Diary #472- Elizabeth Tallent: No One's A Mystery

This week's story came highly recommended by Eva last week, so I just had to give it a shot. "No One's A Mystery" by Elizabeth Tallent is a few brief moments between an 18 year old girl and her boyfriend, a married man named Jack.

Tallent has painted a very precise picture with amazing images; images that are as common as the very scenario she is describing. I love the details. My favourite part of the story comes from the Rosanne Cash song that plays on the radio. Not only does Cash entirely fit this picture, but Jack's question "Do you think she's getting famous because of who her daddy is or for herself?" captures so much of the story's motif, it's brilliant.

It's Jack's characteristic cynicism for sure, and though the girl ignores his question, the closing conversation suggests there is some similarity between Cash and the girl. Had Cash been a cynic like Jack, would she have tried? For now, the girl in this story is also optimistic. (Try not to pay attention to Cash's words if you want to keep the future a mystery.)

Did you write a post for Short Story Monday? If so, please leave your link below.

Labels: , ,

Blogger Book Psmith said...

From both your and Eva's review, this sounds like one I have to read.

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Anonymous Alisa said...

I like the idea of songs used in short stories, but I sometimes wonder if it is a form of cheating. Glad to hear that this one works for you.

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Book Psmith: I hope you enjoy it!

Alisa: Interesting, why do you feel it's cheating? Maybe it's like riding the coattails of the singer or songwriter who's already triggered certain emotions? Anyway, in this case it wasn't a song I was familiar with, so with the exception of the one line quoted, the song didn't bring a lot of connotations- certainly the fact that Rosanne is Johnny Cash's daughter is just as relevant. She could have gone with the original John Hiatt version. Incidentally, I went looking for a copy of the song and Hiatt's was all I could come up with (which I didn't particularly like). Does anyone know where to find Rosanne's?

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger Bybee said...

Isn't it on the Seven Year Ache album???

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Bybee: No, but according to Wikipedia the song (called "It Hasn't Happened Yet) is on her "Somewhere In The Stars" album. Unfortunately, that's not on iTunes in Canada. Grrr.

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

When I need a break from my work reading today, I will dip into this story. As long as it contains no oil industry jargon.

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Alisa said...

Some writing seems to use music as a shortcut to identity (either a character's or the author's), like aspirational chick-lit name-drops luxury brands.

The main accusation, though, is probably against myself. If I'm tempted to drop song lyrics into a story I'm working on, I immediately suspect laziness. I'm relying on an association that means something to me, but might not to anyone else.

It would be nice if it worked seamlessly, like the soundtrack in a movie, but on the page it's usually much more clumsy.

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Barbara: You're back in the working world? That's good though, isn't it?

Alisa: That's a valid issue, but I personally haven't found music all that intrusive. Then, I'm a music and music trivia junkie so I usually just get excited. I do have a problem when an author tries too hard to set the time with music and other pop culture references. Just once I'd like to read a story about the 80s that doesn't mention Rubik's Cube and Thriller.

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Intergalactic Bookworm said...

Hi John-

This is the only short story I read so far and my summary is a couple of weeks old. We have been having both internet AND telephone connections for about 2 months now and I cannot sign into any one of my e-mail addresses, so I haven't been back to my short story group Nutshell Cubbyhole. I am missing that group because of the livly discussions we have on some pf the stories. I am sure that Project Gutenberg and Munsey's have some short story colletions. And thanks for the nice comment you posted on my blog. I got accepted by the special bus service and I am waiting for my blue wheelchair. It will be at least a month before I get it. Blue is my favorite color. I am putting up a followers box and I will like for you to sign up for it. My blog is a mess because of the internet connection; I have been trying for the past two month to take my book challenges from the alphabetical list that I have them in into catagories. Whenever mom says we have three green lights on our modem, we drop everything and go to our computer/ laptop (I have the laptop) because we do not know how long the internet connection will last. I bet that AT&T cringes every time my mom calls them! Judy/IB

Sunday, 05 April, 2009  

Sunday, March 29, 2009

English



So, I'm back in the colonies. England was just swell, but I started to miss the smell of jackpines and moose.

A few reflections: London is wildly entertaining. It's insanely busy. At times, everyone seemed to be coming at us at once as if someone turned on a people hose. We just held on to the kids like our hands were super-glued together and somehow we became a part of it all. On the plus side, there's so much stimulation. Lights and speed and history and modernity. We rode the London Eye and looked down on Big Ben. You could start the day with a full English breakfast (sausages, beans, eggs, etc) and have a grain-fed free-range chicken and organic avocado sandwich for lunch. And when you actually did talk to someone, they were surprisingly friendly. It'd be sad but not unfathomable that living that fast-paced lifestyle would make one distant or cold, but fortunately that wasn't the case. On the down side, there's so much stimulation. It's very commercial and trendy. Did you know I should be wearing a cardigan now? I think I'd look like Harry Weston from Empty Nest. And ladies, you need tight leggings. Floral patterns are also in. I looked at all the billboards and I thought of how lucky my kids are not to be bombarded with that here in Yellowknife. Then, who do you think were the ones that suddenly needed Cadbury chocolates because of a giant cartoon bunny? Perhaps those living amongst it became desensitized somewhat. The locals certainly weren't pointing at all the adverts and signs.

It was a lot of fun to see The Lion King, take a tour on the Thames, ride the Eye, go to the Hard Rock Cafe, visit Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum and the Sherlock Holmes museum, travel on a double decker bus and the tube, and so on. And it was also nice to leave London and see some of the countryside.

Our first non-London stop was Lowestoft, a town on the east coast. We enjoyed walking along the beach (believe it or not we didn't have a single day of rain on our entire trip) and touching the North Sea but the real reason we went there was its proximity to a tiny village called Mutford. We saw pretty much the entire village of Mutford in about an hour and a half, but took loads of pictures. Mutford was quaint and quiet and small-- the complete opposite of London.

After a couple days in the Lowestoft/Mutford area we were off again to Birmingham, which was pretty much a pitstop on our way to Stratford-Upon-Avon. In Stratford-Upon-Avon we visited a huge castle in nearby Warwick that had some parts dating back to 1068. The recorded history of England on the whole was fascinating. I know, with our Native peoples, Canada's history goes back quite far as well; it's just too bad more of it wasn't as well preserved. I will say one thing about England's history, they seem to enjoy the dark stuff. Hey kids, this was where they hanged a guy, this was an axe used in decapitating people who may or may not have been innocent, etc-- all with a huge smile. I found it interesting that in their newspapers people seemed so appauled by "ghoul tourists" who wanted to go see Fritzl's house in Austria. I guess in a hundred years from now visiting his house would be acceptable?

Anyway, in Stratford-Upon-Avon we got to see Shakespeare's birthplace, grave, and a few more Shakespearean sites. Interesting stuff. It was capped off perfectly when we went back to London a few days later and toured the reproduction of the Globe Theatre. In London again, we also made a quick jaunt to Salisbury to visit Stonehenge (and saw one of Sting's houses) and then it was back to Canada.

But how can I forget the crisps (i.e., potato chips)? While we were in England, Walkers (their version of Frito-Lay) was having a contest to pick a new flavour. In the running were Fish and Chips, Builder's Breakfast (a.k.a full English breakfast, see above), Onion Bhaji, Crispy Duck Hoisin, Chilli and Chocolate and... Cajun Squirrel. Of course I tried them all. It's amazing how close some of the flavours are to the real thing. Fish and Chips (my favourite) actually tasted like battered cod and chips, complete with malt vinegar. Even the Builder's Breakfast somehow managed to capture an entire meal in a single crisp. I can only assume the squirrel is accurate, too. Oh you crazy Brits.

Anyway, there was more to the trip than cheap junkfood. I won't share all the photos, but since this is a litblog, I'll leave you with some of the more literary-themed pics.

Me and the bard spent a lot of time together on this trip. As you can tell, we became good friends:

Here's the Globe:

This was where he was born:

This was where he died. The inscription reads:
"Good friend for Jesus sake forbeare,
To dig the dust enclosed here.
Blessed be the man that spares these stones,
And cursed be he that moves my bones."



But of course, there was more than Shakespeare. Turns out Oscar wasn't so wilde after all. He had pretty shoes though:


Dickens:


And another fine literary character:


Guess who I ran into on Baker Street:


Shortly after, my fair lady knocked this down. We took the key and locked her up:



Oh, and this guy runs a litblog. He also owns a post office:


Starting to get tired, I turn to the Yellowknifer for news from home. (Geez, I hope they have the tainted meat taken care of by the time I get back...)

Labels: ,

Blogger Teddy Rose said...

Sounds like an awesome trip! I loved the photos! Especially Dickens and you!

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Blogger Dale said...

What a wonderful travelogue and great photos John! I loved your start about how it seemed like someone turned on a people hose. Brilliant.

You seem awfully familiar with Mr. Wilde there :-) I wonder what he'd have thought of all those crazy crisps?

Reading this really makes me want to re-visit London and surrounding areas.

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

What a great trip! I want to go to England!
I want to eat crisps and wear leggings and do all the things you did. What a wonderful experience for your kids.
thanks for the write up, I felt like I was there, eating the cajun squirrel crisps.

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Blogger claire said...

What a lovely trip. Great post and great photos! And as usual you crack me up (..someone turned on the people hose, lol)! Glad to have you back! :D

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Teddy: I honestly enjoyed every minute of it.

Dale: I think he'd be into the Chilli and Chocolate. Not me though. When I want crisps, I want crisps. When I want chocolate, I want chocolate. I don't think they mixed all that well.

Raidergirl: Now I can officially say that I'd recommend it.

Claire: And despite enjoying England, it is nice to be home again. Thanks!

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Great photo tour! I'm glad to see that you and Oscar hit it off so well. I assume you will maintain some form of correspondence over the pond.

And somehow I always knew you had a Mutford sign growing out of your head.

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Blogger Book Psmith said...

What fun! Thanks for sharing the travelogue and pics.

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Blogger Kelly Fineman said...

Ooh - such great photos! And who knew you were so cute? (Um . . . that wasn't intended to sound pervy. Really and truly.)

MASSIVE envy of your time in England, and major laughs about London bridge.

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Blogger Melanie said...

Love this write up of a trip that sounds wonderful! Great pics too, what a laugh to travel vicariously with you.

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger Mark Leslie said...

Looks like an incredible trip - hilarious photo-journal recounting of highlights, too. Thanks for sharing.

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

Harry Weston!? I don't think so, John. Though you and the soapy man may have taken a few more whacks to the funny bone than the average Joe, you've got a good 30 years before a cardigan would be cause for resemblance.

Floral patterns sound lovely but I did the tight leggings in the '80's — the London fashionistas can keep 'em this go around.

You want to hope you're fair lady doesn't knock you down; I seem to recall a post where you mention she's good with a hammer...

Other than the plane ride home, it looks and sounds as though you and your family enjoyed a wonderful English vacation. Thanks for sharing!

Did you acquire any books while in England?

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger Remi said...

Looks like an amazing trip. England is near the top of my list of places I want to travel to (which is nearly as long as my TBR list, oddly enough).

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger Allison said...

Did you visit The Tower of London? That was one of the most fascinating, yet weirdest experiences I found whilst visiting London. Look kids, its prisoner graffiti!

Indee, the Brits have some questionable chip flavours. But I do miss there size control. Our bags are just too big.

Great pictures! I absolutely love the picture of you at Stonehenge! :)

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Chris said...

Your trip sounds like it was fun! I love your people hose description. I don't know how I'd deal with that.

Love those pics!

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Saturday Word Play- Hardee Har Har Reverse Word Make


In today's Saturday Word Play, I'm attempting a reverse on the old elementary school pasttime, "How many words can you make from the letters in ..." Perhaps you remember being given a word like apocalyptic and given the instructions to make as many words as you can from its letters. You'd find words like lip, cola, clip and so on and, in the end, the person who'd found the most words would win. This time I'm going to tell you the name of a comedian's book as well as words made from the letters of the comedian's name. I won't tell you all the possible words, but I'll give you enough so that all the letters you need will be there. Can you tell me the comedian, as well as three more possible words?

For example, if I gave you

Report: The Book- mire, mike, creme

You would tell me that the comedian is Rick Mercer, and three more words in his name are rim, ere, and rice. (We'll keep all words 3 letters or more.)

Got it?

As always, feel free to do all ten at home but only one answer one in the comment section to allow nine more people to play along.

1. I Am America (And So Can You)- tree, pest, hole, best, teen, core

2. When Will Jesus Bring The Pork Chops?- lion, rage, gag, care

3. Don't Stand Too Close To A Naked Man- lean, mill, late

4. The Pleasure of My Company- tame, sieve, near

5. Bad Golf My Way- sell, inn, seen

6. My Point... And I Do Have One- green, sled, eel

7. My Booky Wook- balls, sure, drab, land

8. How To Talk Dirty and Influence People- nun, cure, ruby, beer, rule

9. Book of Top Ten Lists and Zesty Lo-Cal Chicken Recipes- tater, meal, vile, dad, need

10. The Greedy Bastard Diary: A Comic Tour of America- dice, rice, lice

Labels: , ,

Blogger Book Psmith said...

#2 is George Carlin - green, gorge, cargo

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

#4 is Steve Martin :stem, straiten, vain

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  
Blogger claire said...

#6 Ellen Degeneres: genre, needle, serene.

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

#9 David Letterman
ire, mane, tame

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  
Anonymous Pooker said...

#1 is Stephen Colbert - telephone, chosen, bottle

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  
Anonymous gypsysmom said...

#3 is Tim Allen - lane, mall, tail

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

The only ones that I had any chance at have all been taken. Darned early risers!

Great to see that you made it home, so sorry we were out of town when you came through, though.

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  

Friday, March 27, 2009

Reader's Diary #471- Eric Miller: The Day In Moss


I'll preface this review by saying I was in a rotten mood when I read the book. I was on a nine hour flight back from England and my family was unlucky enough to be among the few passengers without working t.v. sets. Oh yes, what a fine sense of entitlement I have-- but come on, nine hours crammed into an economy seat? If you want, you can discredit my review since I don't have the good common sense to pretend my mood doesn't factor in. I'm so unprofessional.

I usually avoid the En Route Magazine that Air Canada stuffs into the pockets of each seat because I find it to be too pretentious and elitist, obviously aimed at those people in the La-Z Boy recliners being spoon-fed certified organic caviar behind the curtain near the front of the aircraft. But, at only two pages into Miller's The Day In The Moss, I came across these lines:
[...]Nevertheless, the wind in the
willow sings Te Deum laudamus.

Into the liquid shadow of the river willow, Heraclitus slips,
as into a processional shoe[...]
and I considered picking up the En Route after all.

Not quite that desperate, I trudged on...

"the wind, absconds,/ eloping with abysmal azure"

Can I say that I love poetry but I hate words? Eloping with abysmal azure? What the hell is that?

The Day in Moss is full of the usual Greek crap, pseudo-poetic words like "guano" when "shit" would do just fine, and hippie-ish nature worship that uses silly questions to pose as philosophy.

In the first verse of "Diving" he almost had me,

Tilted you stood so long you accrued
the look of a landmark, a conviction held
at once to make and break the horizon.
Pondering your leap as though intent
had to mean more than any event,
like a cairn you balanced your life
or a crouched trunk, temporizing, with an air of eternity,
over whether to topple or not,
surrender antiquity to dissolution.

Okay so that last line's iffy, but I can live with it...

The thought of cold water delayed
your plunge, postponed your changed
as strongly as hands that might restrain you,
a presentiment of shock as hard as stone
yet as penetrable as the light-hearted clouds, all
convertible, with risk, with patience, to pleasure
after the shock of aqueous apotheosis passes.

Gee, which words in that last line do you think I take issue with? Such a shame. Here I was, finally being drawn in, then suddenly I'm hoping the lake is filled with piranhas. Alas, a few stanzas later and still none have shown up.

If I could salvage any poem from the book it would be "Niagara." Like "Diving" it has more of a narrative bent and this seems to keep the thesaurus abuse to a bare minimum. It begins

A diarist relates that, one summer afternoon, in 1793, cruelty
assuming its usual form, human, strolling
along the shore of the Niagara River, loosed
from a dock the canoe in which a Mohawk
slept. It appeared to be an instance of straightforward, mocking
murder and the one that undid the knot never
was detected.

One decent poem out of 75 pages? Good thing I had my memories of an awesome vacation to help with the remainder of the flight. If you're interested, I'll be sharing some of those, along with photos, sometime in the next few days.

Labels: , ,

Blogger Wanda said...

Oh dear, thank goodness for awesome vacation memories...
Sounds to me like you could use a good dose of Alden Nowlan, to shake this one off.

Welcome home, John.

Friday, 27 March, 2009  
Blogger Remi said...

I agree with Wanda. It's time to detox with Nowlan, Al Purdy and Milton Acorn. Toss in a little Bukowski for good measure.

Friday, 27 March, 2009  
Blogger laurasalas said...

Ok, the collection may have stunk, but your review rocked. Thanks for the laugh, and glad you had a terrific vacation!

(I so love accessible poetry rather than posturing crap.)

Friday, 27 March, 2009  
Blogger Kelly Fineman said...

"Can I say that I love poetry but I hate words? Eloping with abysmal azure? What the hell is that?"

AHAHAHA! God, do I love this review. You are made of awesome. (Sorry about the crappy flight, though.)

Friday, 27 March, 2009  
Blogger claire said...

That's funny, lol. I don't think this kind of poetry is for me, either. Btw, welcome back!

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  
Blogger Zachariah Wells said...

I think you have some totally legitimate issues with Miller's verse, John; you raise issues I've addressed in reviews of his past work. And while the problems of that past work are still there in TDiM, I think there's an awful lot of really terrific writing in it, too. For what it's worth, my little review of it's here:

http://www.quillandquire.com/reviews/review.cfm?review_id=6242

Zach

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Wanda: Yes, Nowlan would be a great idea.

Remi: I'll take the Nowlan, Purdy and Bukowski, but you can keep the Acorn. He's a nut.

Laura: I don't know if it's all posturing. Sometimes I felt as if he was just out of touch.

Kelly: Now "made of awesome" is a phrase I understand. Thanks ;)

Claire: Thanks!

Zachariah: I had read your review before beginning mine, actually. While I certainly didn't connect with it, I'm glad you did. I'm also glad, in the interest of balance, you added a link here. I should have done that.

Saturday, 28 March, 2009  

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Tell me where to go

I should be back home tonight. While I sit back and try to recover from jet lag, I'm looking forward to sitting back with a glass of wine, hopefully reading over comments from all the posts I painstakingly prepared in advance for my absence, and seeing what happened in the blogging community. I'll have been gone for a week and a half. What have I missed? Link me to one your favourite blogposts that read in that time-- it might be from someone else's blog, it might be one of your own. I just want to catch-up!

Labels:

Blogger Allison said...

I haven't been around the blogs too much actually, but I do hope that you share some pictures, stories, etc from your trip here. :)

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  
Blogger Book Psmith said...

First...welcome home and I too hope you share stories and pictures from your trip. Second...I can't direct you to your own blog but you had some great posts and posed some interesting questions while you were gone. Third...here are a couple posts from the past week and half that stayed with me and made me think...

Savidge Reads on memoirs:
http://savidgereads.blogspot.com/2009/03/unfinished-words-memoirs.html

Rose City Reader on audiobooks:
http://rosecityreader.blogspot.com/2009/03/book-notes-audio-books.html

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  
Blogger Rose City Reader said...

Thanks Psmith! For both the nice words and for leading me to to this great blog that I have not visited before.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  
Blogger Intergalactic Bookworm said...

Hi John-

Your trip sounded fun. I am still having internet connection problems and my mom has been calling AT&T every 3 to 4 days-I bet that AT&T is cringing every time we called. If you like short stories, I belong to a Yahoo! short story group called Nutshell Cubbyhole. Here is the link to the group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nutshell_Cubbyhole/?yguid=138279587

I finally read my first short story, The Death of Ivan Ilych. The link to my 1 paragraph review is:http://intergalacticbookworm.blogspot.com/2009/03/death-of-ivan-ilych.html

Judy (Intergalactic Bookworm)

Friday, 27 March, 2009  

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

The Great Wednesday Compare #3- Used Books VERSUS New Books


I should be back in Canada today, but not back home in Yellowknife tomorrow...

The Franz Kafka versus Laura Ingalls Wilder debate is still going on until April 1st. So, if you haven't voted yet, head there to do so. But to tide you over until then, feel free to vote on something different.

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (April 1st, 2009), and if you want your choice to get more votes, feel free to promote it here or on your blog!

Who's better?

Labels: , ,

Blogger Sandra said...

Cheaper, previously loved, easier to hold open, can be schlepped around anywhere or taken to the pool and it won't break your heart, or your wallet, if something happens to it. Yup, used.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Blogger Kate said...

I am a sucker for reading books soon after they are published, so I have to vote for New Books. If I only plan to read it once, I will put my name on the waiting list at the library, but if it is one that I think that I may re-read in the future, I will splurge and buy it. I have an envelope on top of one of my bookcases entitled "Kate's Book Fund".

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
OpenID charlotteashley said...

Oooh, tough... "used" can mean so many things Pre-loved? Remaindered? Antiquarian? I loves me that new-book smell, but I have to go to bat for the musty, quirky volumes that give me so much joy.... USED!

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Anonymous Pooker said...

I love used books and buy tons but like Kate, I just have to have that new book as soon as it is published for the feel of it, the smell of it, and the promise of it winking at me from the bookshelf, even if it will be months or years before I actually read it. But the best of all is the ARC arriving in the mail in its nice padded envelope direct from the publisher. It's like being let in on a secret. And I just love those floopy covers. I vote new.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Anonymous August said...

New books. I hate hate hate dealing with other people's filth and scribblings. (Pages torn out, things underline, snot and food and god knows what else smeared in pages, dirt everywhere, dog-eared pages, pages falling out or highlighted... gah, it's disgusting.) I buy only the books that I want to add to my library; books aren't (to me at least), things to be read once and then disposed of, so I'm interested in a copy that's going to last a long time and perhaps put up with some abuse. Used books just don't qualify.

However I buy used/remaindered books almost exclusively, because I have an extremely low income, and have no choice if I want to own any books at all.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Blogger Book Psmith said...

I had to laugh at what August wrote because I just came across some greasy stain on page 89 of my used copy of Blandings Castle. Ewww. In spite of unidentifiable smudges and streaks, I have been buying more used books this year. A lot of the books I want to read are older and no longer available to buy new, so my only option is used. I do prefer new books but I have really curbed my book buying this year. If I can get a few used for the same price as one new, all the better for my pocketbook. So for me, it is a draw between the two.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

The cheapskate in me likes used - I even like the underlined parts, wondering why that particular passage was noted, and I like the thrill of finding a book I didn't even know I wanted, or one that I'd been thinking of.

But the impatient person in me likes new - I want the particular book I want RIGHT NOW and I don't want to wait until I happen upon it used.
I vote both, because it depends on the book and how much I want it.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Blogger Bybee said...

Used books...there's treasure on them there shelves. And no two used bookstores are alike.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Blogger Allison said...

Old books! There is nothing like the musty smell of a used book store to make my heart skip a beat.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  
Blogger Nicola said...

Used books, hands down! First, they are cheaper. But I also love finding things in old books. I love the name often written in the front. I love a dedication if the book was a gift and I absolutely love old, old, books, 1940s and earlier. I just love the history of used books.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  
Blogger Rose City Reader said...

Used. Almost always. It takes me forever to get around to reading a book -- they have to percolate up tot the top of my consciousness. So no need to buy it new.

But I only buy them if they are super clean; with no broken spines; dust jackets in perfect condition (if the book is less than 10 years old, adjusted accordingly for greater age) . . . . you get the idea.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  
Blogger claire said...

I love new, too, but it's so much fun to go hunting among used books.

Friday, 27 March, 2009  
Blogger Teddy Rose said...

For me, both! Sorry, I can't choose. If a book has been out for awhile, I will look for it used first. I like the price savings. However, there are often books I can't wait to get used. Luckly, these days I am able to get a lot of ARC's of books that I want. I have also been luck and have both used and new books on other blogger's blogs. I get just as excite about winning used books as I do new.

Sunday, 29 March, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Used books are more exciting!!! Nietzsche discovered Dostoevsky in a used book shop and Michel Foucault discovered Nietzsche in a used book shop. The influential surprises one uncovers in a good used book shop are unmatched in new bookstores - especially the big box stores!
-Myshkin.

Monday, 30 March, 2009  

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

The Honeymoon's Over

Have you ever read a book you were so smitten with that you pronounced yourself a fan of that author right then and there? Have you then gone to subsequent books by that author and disliked them so much that you question your earlier judgement? I know I loved Pierre Berton's The Arctic Grail so much that I was pretty confident I'd enjoy every other word he'd ever written. Alas, I was very disappointed with The National Dream and The Secret World of Og. I haven't given up on him entirely, but I'm not rushing to read him again anytime soon. Any similar experiences?

Labels: ,

Anonymous gypsysmom said...

My experience was with the author Leon Uris. One of my favourite books of all time is Mila 18 his story about the Warsaw ghetto written long before Schindler's Ark made the story more famous. I also liked QB VII and of course Exodus. However, when I read the last book he wrote, O'Hara's Choice, I was very disappointed but I put it down to the fact that he was ill when he wrote it and died soon after. So I picked up a book he wrote earlier, Mitla Pass, and found it lacking as well.

As for Pierre Berton, I haven't read enough of his works to be disappointed. And I read the Og book when I was in grade school when I really liked it. Maybe the grownup me wouldn't care for it.

Tuesday, 24 March, 2009  
Blogger Remi said...

I prefer to think of the reverse scenario.

In high school I read The Stone Angel by Margaret Laurence. It is not a book for high school students to read. It was such a drag - what did I care about some old lady and her flatuence? Boring and drab and nothing like any of the writers I was into at the time.

First year university Canlit course and I'm faced with this much larger Laurence book, The Diviners. Argh! I start reading it two months early figuring I'd have to labour away. Not so. It immediately went onto my all time top five best novels ever and stayed there.

I re-read The Stone Angel a few years ago and enjoyed it much more.

Tuesday, 24 March, 2009  
Anonymous August said...

Douglas Coupland. I thought Microserfs was one of the best books I've ever read, and I've hated everything else he's ever done, to the point where my opinion is now that he's basically just a self-absorbed yuppie hack, and Microserfs is simply the result of a kind of "even a stopped clock is right twice a day" phenomenon.

Tuesday, 24 March, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi John ... thought I'd stop by and say hi!
Very much enjoyed Berton's "The Arctic Grail" too ... his "The Great Depression" is also very good and in a weird. eerie hindsight (foresight?), reflects some of today's economic and social turmoil.
Uris' "Mila 18" (mentioned by another responder), I read about 25 years ago and is one of the best books I have ever read ... am now reading "The Bielski Brothers" by Peter Duffy, which chronicles the exploits of Jewish partisans in eastern Europe (movie "Defiance") during WW2 ... it's brilliant!
Ciao!
cousin Perry

Tuesday, 24 March, 2009  
Blogger Ali said...

A little bit, with Christopher Moore, because I loved Lamb and Fluke, then I read some of his weirder satirical stuff and it just wasn't the same.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Blogger Corey Redekop said...

I'm not sure if I have such a strong response to any one particular author. That said, after reading Ira Levin's Son of Rosemary, I was prepared to declare that Mr. Levin had been abducted and replaced by a pod person, or possibly James Patterson. And while Robert Heinlein remains a master writer, his late-era novel The Number of the Beast should be erased from the planet.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Gypsysmom: I'm unfamiliar with Leon Uris. Too bad we couldn't know if he felt O'Hara's Choice or Mitla's Pass wasn't as good as his others.

Remi: The reverse is interesting. It happened to me with Wayne Johnston. I couldn't stand The Story of Bobby O'Malley and probably wouldn't have read anything else by him but then The Colony of Unrequited Dreams was up for Canada Reads one year and I gave him a 2nd chance. So glad I did; it's one of my favourites.

August: Yes, sometimes I'm inclined to think they just got got lucky once.

Perry: Two people professing their love for Mila 18. I guess I have a new book on my tbr pile!

Ali: I feel that way about some musicians. On the one hand, I'd like them to mix it up not get in any creative ruts. But when it fails, it's like I wish they'd just stuck to what they did best.

Corey: Maybe you could do a literary remix of The Number of the Beast. Could be an interesting project.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  

Monday, March 23, 2009

Reader's Diary #470- George Gissing: A Victim of Circumstances


Trying to find a short story by Charles Dickens online, I stumbled upon a story by one of Dickens' supporting critics, George Gissing. I'd not heard of Gissing before so I decided to read his instead. Am I ever glad I did.

"A Victim of Circumstances" is the story of the Castledines, a couple of artists living in rural England in the latter half of the 19th century. The catch is that they have put their energies behind the husband, Horace's, career when clearly it is the wife, Hilda, who has the most talent.

I've often wondered how it is that couples pursuing the same artistic endeavours survive. How does Tabitha King, for instance, deal with her husband's success? And I have to wonder if Graeme Gibson didn't give up writing novels because of feelings of inadequacy.

But even beyond the obvious marital tensions such a circumstance would create, there are so many other interesting angles to pursue. I was embarrassed to see a little of myself in Horace. I've tried, perhaps lazily and haphazardly, my hand at poetry and this amateur floundering is paralleled wickedly in Horace's attempt at historical paintings. There's also an excellent feminist undercurrent in the story that I was quite surprised to see in a story written by a Victorian-era male writer.

I'm very much looking forward to discovering more of Gissing's stories.

Did you write a post for Short Story Monday? If so, please leave a link below.

Labels: , , ,

Blogger J.C. Montgomery said...

I'm definitely going to have to write this one down. As you noted, it sounds very unlike what a man would write during the Victorian period, hence why it sounds so intriguing.

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger Teddy Rose said...

This one sounds really good John! Thanks for the link, I just printed it off.

I am still playing cach-up with ARC deadlines so alas, I will not have a whort story review this week either.

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger Lynda said...

I have a novel by Gissing waiting to be read on my shelves. Thanks for this review - I'm off to read this short story now ;0)
Mine this week is a fairytale:
http://lyndasbookblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/godmother-death-by-jane-yolen-short.html

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Anonymous Tea said...

I read another story this Monday. Now, I need to go and write my comments.

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger JoAnn said...

This sounds like a very interesting story. I'll be reading it later this week...thanks!

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger Eva said...

I second J.C.! I'm not sure I'd want to be married to someone who is in the exact same career field as mw if they were at all competitive.

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
OpenID Alisa said...

This sounds very interesting.

One horrifying perspective on the two-writer household can be found in Elizabeth Jane Howard's memoir 'Slipstream' - she talks a lot about living & writing with husband Kingsley Amis.

I am regularly thankful that I am not in a relationship with a person whose creative ambitions run parallel to mine.

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger Book Psmith said...

Happy Monday everyone! John - Sounds like a very good story. I will have to check it out this week.

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger katrina said...

Gissing's novel New Grub Street is well worth a read. Story looks great.
Linked my story review

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger Isabella said...

I read and enjoyed New Grub Street last year -- about the publishing industry. Doris Lessing sang Gissing's praises in an essay -- I'm glad I followed up on it.

Tuesday, 24 March, 2009  
Blogger Melanie said...

Gissing is one of the only men to be published by Virago press. His "The Odd Women" is a wonderful look at women's roles and feminist issues in Victorian England -- I reviewed a while back and called it more of a social tract than a novel, which I would still say, but it is quite intriguing to read.

Wednesday, 25 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

J.C.: While the feminist angle isn't the only theme of the story, it was somewhat surprising.

Teddy: Looking forward to have you back at the short stories again soon, I hope!

Lynda: I'd not even heard of Gissing before now. I'll be looking for his novels, for sure.

Tea: I'll check it out. Thanks!

JoAnn: Come back and tell me what you thought.

Eva: Actually my wife and I are in the same field but we're not competitive in the least.

Alisa: I'll be on the lookout for Howard's book. Sounds interesting.

Book Psmith: One of the better ones I've read so far this year.

Katrina: Once again, it looks like I'm one of the few unfamiliar with Gissing.

Isabella: Doris Lessing? That's high praise.

Melanie: Maybe we can have a Gissing revival.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Publishers Clearing House

What are your thoughts on publishing companies? Do you have any favourites- ones whose books you turn to more often and on purpose? I'd venture to say that most of mine are from Random House. But honestly, it's because they sent me a bunch of freebies, not from any particular loyalty. My reviews haven't been swayed. Still, they get more people talking about their books and we get freebies, so it's win-win even if we sometimes give bad reviews, right? I find those people who support smaller publishers admirable, but I've never really actively sought them out. Recently, I also found myself reading a lot of Drawn and Quarterly books, but I'd been participating in a Graphic Novels Challenge, and D & Q seems to have cornered that market in Canada.

What about you?

Labels: , ,

Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

To be honest, I have never really paid a lot of attention to the publisher. I probably should.

Sunday, 22 March, 2009  
Blogger Sam Sattler said...

Over the years, I've learned to trust certain publishers over others but all of the publishing mergers in recent years have confused the issue for me.

I do have favorite publishers still based on the quality of their physical product. I hate hardcovers printed on cheap paper and using cheap boards. A little extra quality in the product makes all the difference to me.

Sunday, 22 March, 2009  
Blogger Teddy Rose said...

I have been lucky and have been approached by many different publishers to review books. I only take books that I am really interested in. Every once in awhile I'll take one that's not from my normal favorite genres for a change of pace.

I have had good experiences with all the publishers I have worked with so far. I have been approched by publishers that I don't want to work with but that is because they pretty much focus on one genre, one that I don't care for. Such as christian fiction, etc.

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger Remi said...

I'm partial to Coach House Books but more because when I'm wandering around the Annex at night I love to wander down the alley behind what was once Rochdale College and see a press in action.

Besides, they print wonderful small press books I go back to again and again - 'All My Friends Are Superheroes', 'Eunoia', the Utopia series of books about Toronto and even a book celebrating what Toronto does best - concrete buildings.

Tuesday, 24 March, 2009  
Blogger JK said...

I can go further than a specific publisher, I'm partial to an imprint. I am always drawn (whether consciously or not) to Vintage books (and imprint of Random House). I am repeatedly drawn to their design and their content when I'm in an Indigo (or maybe they just buy most of the table space). But in any case, I've come to trust them because they usually don't let me down.

That said, for beautiful book objects, you often can't do better than places that print their own - Coach House or Gaspereau Press (in Kentville, NS).

Tuesday, 24 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Barbara: I usually pay attention, but after the fact.

Sam: The quality angle is something I've only recently started paying attention to. There's a certain publisher that annoys me their insistence on glossy photographs for their covers.

Teddy: I must say that while Random House is probably looked at by some as the biggie, therefore the baddie, the people I've dealt with their give it a very personable approachable touch.

Remi: I've enjoyed a lot of theirs, too.

JK: So much better than those that use stock photos for cover art.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Saturday Word Play- On Dover Beach Clothesline Words


In this week's Saturday Word Play, I've come up with something I'd like to call clothesline words. It's an easy concept, but one I'm not sure if I know how to explain adequately, but here goes:

I'll give you a lists of words (this time they'll all come from Matthew Arnold's poem, "Dover Beach"). One of the words in each list will act as the clothesline word. You're job is to tell me what that clothesline word is. What is a clothesline word, you ask? It's the one word that all the others in the list can be pinned on, by means of a letter in common. In other words, one word will have at least one letter in common with all the others.

For instance, if I gave you the words Icy, Ape, Cat, and Act you could work it out as follows on a piece of paper:



and tell me that the clothesline word is Cat.

As always, feel free to answer all ten at home, but only answer one in the comments section:

1. French, turbid, flight, cliffs, gleams, furled, misery
2. round, sweet, stand, naked, night, world
3. this, true, full, help, hear
4. his, and, the, sea
5. long, calm, moon, back, also
6. human, sound, coast, plain, heard, seems
7. listen, breath, really, dreams, girdle, armies, alarms
8. brought, pebbles, thought, eternal, England, hearing, another, sadness
9. note, from, lies, come, once
10. bay, you, are, ebb

Labels: , , ,

Blogger Kristi said...

Hello - The clothesline word for the first set is Cliffs. Did you work all these out yourself??

Wow

Saturday, 21 March, 2009  
Blogger claire said...

My favourite poem.
#7 seems to have 3 clothesline words: dreams, armies, alarms. Is that right?

Saturday, 21 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

#4 is sea
These are a fun!

Hope you're having a wonderful time on vacation!

Saturday, 21 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

#5 is calm

Saturday, 21 March, 2009  
Blogger Kate said...

#3 is true

Saturday, 21 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Kristi: They're actually easier to create than workout.

Claire: I guess so! I had worked it out with "dreams," but the others work, too.

Wanda: Thanks, and I did!

Raidergirl and Kate: Both correct.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  

Friday, March 20, 2009

Poetry Friday- William Carlos Williams: Danse Russe


I love this poem.

Danse Russe
by William Carlos Williams

If I when my wife is sleeping
and the baby and Kathleen
are sleeping
and the sun is a flame-white disc
in silken mists
above shining trees,--
if I in my north room
dance naked, grotesquely
before my mirror
waving my shirt round my head
and singing softly to myself:
"I am lonely, lonely.
I was born to be lonely,
I am best so!"
If I admire my arms, my face,
my shoulders, flanks, buttocks
again the yellow drawn shades,--

Who shall say I am not
the happy genius of my household?

Labels: , ,

Blogger Sandra said...

I have always love W.C.W. since I discovered him in a poetry anthology when I was a child. As he was also a physician, I don't suppose he'd actually do something like it, but it's delightful to imagine it. A lovely choice of his poetry.

Friday, 20 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

Brought a smile, thanks for scheduling this one. :)

Friday, 20 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

What a fantastic image! And what a joyful poem.

I hope you are too busy to read your comments, but if you do happen to catch a moment, you had better be having a wonderful trip!

Friday, 20 March, 2009  
Blogger Sherrie said...

Hi John,
That's a beautiful poem! Have never read this author before. I have finished 3 more books for the 2nd Canadian Reading Challenge. They are:
Detective - Arthur Hailey
Someone Else's Ghost - Margaret Buffie
Airborn - Kenneth Oppel
Have a great evening!

Sherrie

Friday, 20 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Sandra: I've read little by him, but have enjoyed and/or found thought provoking those that I have. I really need to pick up a collection.

Wanda: Certainly smile inducing, eh?

Barbara: I didn't get to check them once, but I had a ball so it's okay.

Sherrie: You've probably come across some of his poems before but just not paid attention to the name of the poet. Maybe "This is Just To Say" or "The Red Wheelbarrow" ring a bell?

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Oldspapers


A few thoughts and questions on newspapers. Are they dying? Do you care? Since someone first coined the slogan, "Internet- Not just for porn!" the first question has been tossed around again and again. But people have also predicted the demise of hardcopy books as well, and those certainly seem to be going strong, despite Oprah's Kindle giveaways. Perhaps the 2nd question is the more important one to be asking. When it comes to books, I don't see the day when I'm downloading the majority of my books, despite loving finding short stories and poetry online. I like the actual feel of the book in my hands when I'm in it for the long haul. I don't, however, feel the same way about the newspapers. Admittedly, I've never been much of a newspaper reader. I skim the local ones each week, looking primarily for things to do on the weekend, and secondarily for my once a month book review the Yellowknifer has been so kind as to print. As for the national papers, The Globe and Mail and The National Post, I usually only end up reading one if I'm on a flight, simply because it's there. When I think of those huge beastly papers, I think of the waste. How much of the paper do you actually read? If you're like me you read about 30% of it and the rest is crumpled unceremoniously at your feet. What other product would we be content to use 30% and throw the rest away? Would you buy a loaf of bread, eat six slices and throw the rest in the trash? Would you throw away a roll of toilet paper with 60% left on? I could go on.

Seems to me the most logical thing to do is go to the Internet. It's what we did when musicians were only giving us a couple good songs per cd. The newspaper is even worse. At least with a cd you'd feel like giving the whole thing a chance. But, if you're not going to be buying a house, do you need the real estate section? If you aren't into sports, are you going to check last nights scores? If you haven't invested, are you going to be reading the stocks? With the Internet, you read what you want. And for the billions of sites you don't (or shouldn't) there's not a bunch of paper left over that you'll most likely forget to recycle. And your hands stay clean.

On the other hand, I'm sure people would question the quality of information on the Internet. You'd most likely (but not guaranteed) trust a print journalist over the stranger behind the last Wikipedia article you read, right? But the National Enquirer isn't a newspaper, and likewise there are certain sites most reasonable people wouldn't go for the news. I check out cbc.ca, ctv.ca, bbc.com, and cnn.com. Sure, there's a Western spin, but no more so than the national papers.

Then, this is all from someone who has never been all that into newspapers. For me to question their relevance is no big deal. I should also note that I've never checked the New York Times Review of Books in my life-- maybe I don't know what I'm missing.

Where do you stand?

Labels: , ,

Blogger Book Psmith said...

I buy one paper a year every April for the L.A. Times Festival of Books schedule. I get my news from the internet (only from reliable sources) and the radio...all without smudging my fingers thank you very much (can't stand that ink all over my fingers). I will never convert to reading books electronically. It just won't happen. I love everything about the physical existence of a book. I heard someone on radio saying just for the fact that they no longer have to carry a suitcase of books when they travel anymore was reason enough to have a Kindle. In all my years of travelling, I have never begrudged my overflowing bag of books their heaviness or inconvenience, or the added weight of the ones I pick up along the way. I love having them with me. So to sum it up...news, yes, but no newspapers, and actual books, yes, but no electronic reading devices.

Thursday, 19 March, 2009  
Anonymous Megan said...

I never pick up a dead-tree version of the newspaper. I get all of my news online.

Thursday, 19 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I read the paper every day (and never forget to recycle), but lately have been thinking that perhaps that has to change. I'm trying to be less wasteful. But then I would use electricity to read the news. But then, the computer is on anyway...

Thursday, 19 March, 2009  
Blogger Sandra said...

Interesting points. I do not read newspapers period-I never have. But then I do not watch television or read trade magazines either-for news or anything else. I do however read book review sections in print and online. So, a Saturday edition of the newspapers for the 3 men in the house with the book sections for me and that's it. I will never give up books, although I do read them online if it means saving money by not having to buy them. And I always know what's going on in the world because the rest of you are always talking about it. Newspaper are printed for commercial purposes and I wouldn't mind seeing the end of them. But that's not going to happen any more than the several pounds of flyers left at our doors each week are going to disappear. An awful waste of resources, as you say, but people will be given what they want and are willing to pay for. I suspect that newspapers are a habit that most people are unwilling to break.

Friday, 20 March, 2009  
Blogger C. B. James said...

When I lived in San Francisco I read three to four newspapers a day. They used to have two decent daily papers and a slew of free neighborhood weeklies and community papers. I was also a regular reader of the New York Times when I could find on left behind on public transit.

But papers have not kept up with the times. They've largly stayed the same or cut themselves to the bone, while readers have moved on to internet sources. I can't think of the last time a print book review moved me to buy a book while blog reviews do so regularly.

Now I buy a Times probably twice a month. I still love to sit in a coffee shop and read through the paper, but it's become a treat rather than a daily habit.

Saturday, 21 March, 2009  
Anonymous Carrie K said...

I subscribed to the SF Chronicle because it used to have an 8 page book section in the Sunday edition, not to mention the Pink Sheet, a must read for me since forever. But it's a shadow of itself.

I also subscribe to the local paper. I don't read it everyday or even all of it, but I do like that right at my doorstep (or, more likely nowadays, in the gutter at the end of the driveway) there's a summation of local, national and international news.

Sadly I'll probably get used to my news online unlike reading a book.

Monday, 23 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

An interesting couple of postscripts:
1. I just got back from England, and my God, London is insane with newspapers. We couldn't go five feet without someone thrusting a free copy of the Metro or whatever in our faces. What's Geri Halliwell up to this week? Who cares. Granted it killed a lot of time for Tube travellers but holy crap, what a waste.

2. There was a piece about this in the Globe and Mail today (I read it on the flight back). His arguments for newspapers mostly revolved around the way newspapers make money with advertisements that go to fund dangerous and quality journalism. I'm sure one day someone will figure out how to make money of this Internet thing and when they do, they can afford to pay some journalists. Furthermore, his "danger" point would hold a lot more substance if not surrounded by stories about fall's anticipated TV line-up and a theatre accounting fraud.

Thursday, 26 March, 2009  

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The Great Wednesday Compare #3- Apples VERSUS Oranges


Last week's Franz Kafka versus Laura Ingalls Wilder debate is still going on until April 1st. So, if you haven't voted yet, head there to do so. But to tide you over until then, feel free to vote on a real apples versus oranges contest. (Don't worry, my brain and I will be back from vacation soon!)

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (April 1st, 2009), and if you want your fruit to get more votes, feel free to promote them here or on your blog!

Who's better?

Labels: , ,

Blogger Corey Redekop said...

Apples!

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger Nicole said...

This.is.Awesome!

Apples.

Although, if it is the Granny Smith apple vs. an orange, then I choose oranges, because Granny Smith Apples are too tart.

However, if it is a Pink Lady apple vs. an orange, then apples win, hands down.

Yes, I'm sure now.

Apples.

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

Oranges.

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger Daibhin said...

Apples! Can you make a pie out of oranges - No!

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

* Corey: Did you put John up to this? *

Hmm, lets see...
Oranges beat apples for eating.
Apples beat oranges for cooking.
Orange juice beats apple juice for vitamin C content but oh, that apple cider...

Darn it! My first Wednesday Compare and I still can't decide and I thought this one would be easy!

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger Sherrie said...

Hi John,
I'll go with Apples. I also finished another book for the 2nd Canadian Reading Challenge. "Detective" by Arthur Hailey. You can see my review here: http://sherriesbooks.blogspot.com/2009/03/detective.html Have a great day!!

Sherrie

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger Bybee said...

Apples.

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger Remi said...

Apples.

No, oranges.

Forget it. I'm going with grapes.

Thursday, 19 March, 2009  
Anonymous barefootheart said...

Some say the orange is best,
Some say the apple.
From what I've tasted of juice,
I hold with those who say orange.
But if I were baking a pie,
I think I know enough of apples
To say that for baking, apples
Are also great,
And would suffice.

Thursday, 19 March, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oranges. Vitamin C is sooo important in late winter. In the middle of summer, apples may win. Especially if they're still dangling from a tree. Crab apples, however, would beat Oranges any day.

Thursday, 19 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Oranges! I think I am addicted to those massive sweet winter ones.

Thursday, 19 March, 2009  
Blogger Sandra said...

What an impossible choice! There are over a thousand varieties of apples to choose from. I love them raw but not cooked. And you can make an orange pie. I brought a recipe home from Florida once and made them, they are delicious. Apples for crunching, oranges for juice, or the scent, or when you're sick. Can't decide, it's too much like comparing...apples and oranges.

Friday, 20 March, 2009  
Blogger Melanie said...

Seeing as I just read a great food book with a long and luscious description of the wild apple orchards of Kazakhstan, I'll go with apples. (I hope it doesn't hurt any citrusy feelings out there...)

Saturday, 21 March, 2009  

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

This one goes out to the one I love...

A few years back I took a workshop on teaching reading to early and emergent readers. For those children at the beginning stages, it was suggested to quickly review some of the basic book concepts each time before reading aloud: point out the cover, where the author's name is found, the illustrator, and read the dedication. I usually do the first three but pretty much always skip the dedication. I don't know who Wanda is, so why should I care? What about you? Do you read the dedications? Do you think it's important? What is the dedication in the book you're currently reading? Mine, Stuart Christie's Granny Made Me An Anarchist, says "To 'B' the next link in the chain." Who is B? Is there a Shakespeare reference in there? Is this a private joke? This illustrates precisely why I don't care (though I'm sure B is quite flattered). If you were to write a book, for whom would you dedicate it and why?

Labels: , ,

Blogger claire said...

The book I'm reading right now says, To J.R.M., which is kind of nice because all those letters are contained in my husband's name. But yes, I love reading dedications. I don't know what it is but I always, and I mean always, read them. I especially like the ones that say a bit more than the name. You know, you make me want to dig out all my books and read the dedications.. and if I find some good ones might just dedicate a post to them. :D

Tuesday, 17 March, 2009  
Blogger Lynda said...

I don't read dedications - although if I ever did write a book I'd dedicate it to my mum and grandmother.
Maybe I'll start reading them now!

Tuesday, 17 March, 2009  
OpenID Kiggavik said...

I usually read the dedications, for no other reason but to see if there is a dedication. I think that it is nice to know that there is someone who the author cares about, enough to let them know about via a book.

I think if I ever do write that book the dedication would depend on the book. I edited a short memoir of my Grandfather's a few years back - for family. Doing it was a homage to him, and in some ways it would seem redundant to dedicate it to him. But I did dedicate it to someone (which may be presumptuous as it was really Grandpa's book). The dedication read...

To my Dad, the greatest influence on my life, and the man I most wish I was.

Tuesday, 17 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

Of course I do. I read everything in a book - the dedication, the opening quote, if there is one, the publication date.
If there are words, I'll read them.

in Anne of Avonlea, which happened to be nearby:
to my former teacher Hattie Gordon Smith in grateful remembrance of her sympathy and encouragement

Tuesday, 17 March, 2009  
Blogger Book Psmith said...

I do read dedications. They only take a second to read and sometimes there are some real gems: a really great quote or a touching expression of love or a show of gratitude. Surprisingly there is no dedication in the book I am currently reading. They seem so commonplace now but I wonder if there was a time when dedications were the exception instead of the rule. If I wrote a book, I would probably dedicate it to myself since I did all the work. Just kidding:) Depends on the type of book...if it was a children's, definitely my daughters because it is the crazy stuff they do that makes me say 'that would make a great kid's book'...a more grown-up book would be anyone instrumental in encouraging my love for the written word like my sister, mom, dad or grandparents.

Tuesday, 17 March, 2009  
Blogger raych said...

The dedications in the Lemony Snickett Unfortunate Events series SLAY me. I recommend them.

Tuesday, 17 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

"...a simple prop to occupy my time..."

Yes, I read them and so does my 8-y.o. when she finds them in her chapter books. Dedication page for 'Coventry' simply states: For My Parents. One of the most touching ones that I've come across is from 'I Promise I'll Find You', dedicated in part to "all of the missing children in the world."

Oh btw, I'm Wanda, and of course you should care! :P

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger Ali said...

I always read the dedications. I love that little moment that I get to spend with the author before beginning their book.

Sunday, 22 March, 2009  

Monday, March 16, 2009

Reader's Diary #470- Graham Greene: The Destructors


Ever have a job you absolutely loathed? I have-- but should any of my current employers read this, this was many, many years ago, I swear. While I'm giving away my secrets, I may as well go all out. One day when I was the only one at work, I was so embittered and bored that I had a wicked fantasy of wrecking the place. Of course I didn't act on it, but just the thought alone was cathartic. Plus, as I imagined myself smashing the pictures on the wall, ripping up the carpet, and so on, the sheer magnitude of it became half the fun. How could I destroy the place better than a mere vandalizing punk? By making sure every inch of the place was beyond recognition. It was no longer enough to smash the picture, now I had to bend up the frame, shred the photos, and snip the hanging wire as well. Ooops, maybe I should also remove the tacks holding the frame together and bend those out of shape, too.

Ahh, don't run away. It was a harmless little daydream, the building and all it's contents are still in tact. Besides, if Graham Greene's "The Destructors" is any indication, I'm not the first one to have this particular fantasy.

Of course, there's always a certain unease when someone admits to a taboo thought that you've shared: should you be relieved that you're not alone? Or should you be scared that you're not alone? But just to clarify, it's Greene to whom I relate, not the characters in his story. Greene seemed to have fun simply fantasizing, while the boys of "The Destructors" are the ones who act it out. There's a huge difference.

"The Destructors" is a wonderfully provocative story.

If you've written a post for Short Story Monday, please leave a link below!

Labels: , ,

Blogger Book Psmith said...

Definitely had a couple of those jobs but my fantasies never got better than the plain old act of quitting.

Monday, 16 March, 2009  
Blogger JoAnn said...

I had a job where I felt that way, too! I've never read any of Greene's short stories, but I did like The End of the Affair.

Monday, 16 March, 2009  
Blogger Eva said...

I'm a big fan of Graham Greene, so I'll have to check this one out! I haven't had a job like that yet, but I'm still young, so I imagine I will at some point. ;)

Monday, 16 March, 2009  
Anonymous Alisa said...

I love Graham Greene. It never occurred to me to try his short stories. I bet they're terrific.

(I don't think I've ever felt that way about a job...I've never *cared* enough to want to expend that kind of energy).

Monday, 16 March, 2009  
Blogger Lynda said...

I haven't read much Green - but will search out some of his stories thanks to your review.
My story is up late - but better late than never ;0)

Tuesday, 17 March, 2009  
Blogger Teddy Rose said...

I have had a couple jobs like that in my younger years! Sounds like a gre3at story! Thanks John!

Saturday, 21 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

I've been informed that the story link above is no longer valid. However, my informant helps me even further by finding it elsewhere: http://www.sangam.org/articles/view/?id=183

Monday, 01 February, 2010  

Sunday, March 15, 2009

While I'm Away


Remember Mike Myers' Linda Richman character of Saturday Night Live's Coffee Talk? Like her, I'm going to throw out a few topics for discussion over the next week and a half. I'm going to be away but please "Talk amongst yourselves..." When I get back from England, I hope to see some great conversations.

The first one is "lists." I had someone say to me recently that he found the idea of listing arbitrary and I know some people find lists pointless. Me? I'm a list maker. I'm not list-obsessed like John Cusack's character in High Fidelity or anything, but I enjoy a good top 10 list from time to time. What about you? Do you like find yourself cataloguing your least favourite vegetables or your top five reasons you think turtles are better than guinea pigs? Or do you find the whole excercise boring or irrelevant? If you are a list-maker, please feel free to leave any book or reading related list below. Here's one of mine:

Top five places I like to read:
1. couch- surprisingly I still use this even after I gave up T.V.
2. bathtub- it takes special skill and timing not to get the pages wet, but I've gotten it down to a science
3. bed- this was number one until recently, but lately I just haven't found it comfortable or too comfortable and I fall asleep after too few pages
4. toilet- yes, BookCrossers beware: my books have been flagged.
5. office- I brought a book to work recently to read during my lunch break. I really should be more social than this, but I've discovered a way to get through more reading in in a day and so, my co-workers will have to do without my stimulating conversations about the top five places I like to read.

Labels: ,

Blogger Beth F said...

I'm a list maker but not in the same way you are. I make to-do lists (work tasks, what to pack for a trip, grocery store). I'm horrible at any lists that require best of or worst of; my mind immediately goes blank, and I can't think of anything.

Sunday, 15 March, 2009  
Blogger claire said...

I love making lists, too. And my favourite places to read are the couch, first, and then the bed. I love it on the couch when it's silent (ie. tv turned off) and sunshine is streaming from the windows. I don't read in the bathroom at all, afraid to wet them and contract them with germs, lol. Other favourite places to read are in the car and doctors' clinics.

Sunday, 15 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I live to list!

My top five favourite places to read are:
1. bed - even though I too often fall asleep after the first paragraph, yet without reading, I can't fall asleep.
2. front porch
3. back porch
4. the ugly green chair in the living room by the big window
5. chesterfield, but I can't recline it, or I fall asleep after one paragraph. I am obviously not meant to read lying down.

Have a wonderful trip!

Sunday, 15 March, 2009  
Blogger Book Psmith said...

I always enjoyed making to do lists for the pure joy of seeing everything get crossed off when done. Now I make lists because I forget too many things. My favorite places to read are: 1. my reading chair with ottoman under a quilt; 2. in bed right before passing out; 3. I love to read any place I am on vacation; 4. kitchen while cooking; 5. I feel like George Costanza when admitting this but, yes, in the bathroom (it sounds so gross when you say it but really it is most practical).

Monday, 16 March, 2009  
Blogger Darcie said...

I am a list maker!! Especially to do lists, but I love keeping track of the books that I have read too!

I also read in the car...with a book on tape! If you haven't tried this you should!

Monday, 16 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

Lists? I've made a few but it's not something I make a habit of unless we're talking groceries or Christmas shopping.

I did make a list of favourite names when I was pregnant with each of my three children but ended up using none I had listed. The kids though, get a kick out of learning what their name could have been (especially those chosen for the opposite sex).

When my list of books I want to read grew longer than my arm, I started keeping track of them with on-line lists at the library and Chapters. Speaking of which, my favourite places to read are:
1. Snuggled up with my daughter, on her bed--sometimes to each other, sometimes to ourselves side-by-side.
2. Under the apple or silver maple trees in my front yard (spring - fall).
3. In the rocker by the woodstove (winter).
4. At the end of my driveway while waiting for my youngest to arrive home from school.
5. My local library. I love the company of all those books! No book has ever pestered me with a litany of questions about where to find things, what to do or what's for supper.

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Saturday Word Play- British Ladies 1-2-3


Keeping with the all things British theme (I'm headed there tomorrow. Yipee!), this week we visit the ladies of Britain. I'll give you 10 sets of clues. Figure out the first clue in each set, add a letter and unscramble it to find the answer to the second clue, then add another letter and unscramble it to tell me the name of a British female author (bfa). To help you along, I've given you a list featuring one title (not in the same order) by each of the authors. For instance:

Let's say "Lady Geraldine's Courtship" was listed amongst the titles. You might find the this set of clues and work it out as follows:

i. arguing - rowing
ii. toenail problem- ingrown (rowing +n)
iii. bfa - Browning (ingrown + b)

Elizabeth Barret Browning wrote "Lady Geraldine's Courtship."

As always feel free to do all ten at home, but only answer one in the comment section. That way nine more people will have the chance to play along:

Titles:
Now You See Me; Pride and Prejudice; And Then There Were None; The Mill On The Floss; Mrs. Dalloway; Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone; Oranges Are Not The Only Fruit; Jane Eyre; Daphne du Maurier; The Tale of Beatrix Potter

1. i. cashews and pecans
ii. songs
iii. bfa

2. i. being in debt
ii. lake sport
iii. bfa

3. i. belongs to them
ii. the ones with the most money
iii. bfa

4. i. wise bird
ii. sheep fibre
iii. bfa

5. i. phone sound
ii. popular steak
iii. bfa

6. i. Frost or Dickinson
ii. language used in a figurative or non-literal sense
iii bfa

7. i. fate (as in your _ in life)
ii. "Bubble, bubble, _ and trouble"
iii. bfa

8. i. determines one's position
ii. people who chant
iii. bfa

9. i. cold Jack
ii. the wood
iii. bfa

10. i. ridicule by irony and sarcasm
ii. prioritizes patients by condition
iii. bfa

Labels: , ,

Blogger Sandra said...

1.i. cashews and pecans - nuts
ii. songs - tunes
iii. bfa - Austen
Jane Austen wrote "Pride and Prejudice".

These are fun John, thanks.

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  
Blogger Beth F said...

2. i. being in debt -- owing
ii. lake sport -- rowing
iii. bfa --rowling

J. K. Rowling -- The Philosopher's Stone

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

4. i. wise bird - owl
ii. sheep fibre - wool
iii. bfa - woolf

Virginia Woolf wrote Mrs Dalloway

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  
Blogger claire said...

3. i. belongs to them ~ theirs
ii. the ones with the most money ~ richest
iii. bfa ~ Christie
Agatha Christie wrote And Then There Were None.

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  
Anonymous Wanda said...

OK, I think I've got #6 but I also had to subtract a letter so I'm not sure...

6. i. Frost or Dickinson - poet
ii. language used in a figurative or non-literal sense - poetry
iii. bfa Beatrix Potter

*The Tale of Peter Rabbit*

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  
Blogger Teena in Toronto said...

Way too complicated for me! Ha!

I just finished #17:

http://www.purple4mee.com/2009/03/book-foods-pets-die-for-2008-ann-n.html

Enjoy your weekend!

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Sandra: No, thank-you!

Beth: That's right.

Raidergirl: Good job.

Claire: That's it-- though it was also known under some other more offensive titles.

Wanda: The author and answer to first clue are correct, but the second answer is "trope" not "poetry". Otherwise, good job!

Teena: Thanks.

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  
Anonymous gypsysmom said...

#7 i lot
ii toil
iii bfa= George Eliot who wrote Mill on the Floss which I finally managed to read in January this year.

Sunday, 15 March, 2009  

Friday, March 13, 2009

Reader's Diary #469- Christina Rossetti: Poems


A couple weeks back, Barbara, a faithful reader of mine, commented regarding my complaint that Ocavio Paz's poetry was too inaccessible. She said that for her "poetry is never very accessible, so I find I do best to just let it flow over me like a stream."

Fortunately, with Rossetti's poems I felt I had both: accessibility + that flowing stream business. It's been a long time since I've read a poetry collection with such beautiful rhythm. Even when I picked up the book later at night, when I was too tired to attend to the meaning behind the words, the mood of the poems still sank in. They were very technically and emotionally appealing.

Containing her lyric poems, dramatic and narrative poems, rhymes and riddles, sonnet sequences and prayers and meditations, it's hard for me to select a favourite. But, I've chosen to highlight "Goblin Market." Though I've just discovered that's it's one of Rossetti's most well-known poems, I wasn't familiar with it. Not that the poems up to that point were childish or naive; for instance, many of them dealt with death, however "Goblin Market" shocked me to attention. It's certainly not graphic by today's standards, but there's a lot of suggestive imagery in there that I'm sure even the most novice of poetry readers would pick up on. Apparently she claimed it was a children's poem, which reminds me of that Beatles bit about "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" supposedly having been inspired by Lennon's son's painting, not LSD. Right. Anyway, "Goblin Market" may not be about hallucinogenics, but written in the Victorian era, I guess she still needed a good cover story. Decide for yourself:

Goblin Market
by Christina Rossetti

Morning and evening
Maids heard the goblins cry:
'Come buy our orchard fruits,
Come buy, come buy:
Apples and quinces,
Lemons and oranges,
Plump unpecked cherries,
Melons and raspberries,
Bloom-down-cheeked peaches,
Swart-headed mulberries,
Wild free-born cranberries,
Crab-apples, dewberries,
Pine-apples, blackberries,
Apricots, strawberries;--
All ripe together
In summer weather,--
Morns that pass by,
Fair eves that fly;
Come buy, come buy:
Our grapes fresh from the vine,
Pomegranates full and fine,
Dates and sharp bullaces,
Rare pears and greengages,
Damsons and bilberries,
Taste them and try:
Currants and gooseberries,
Bright-fire-like barberries,
Figs to fill your mouth,
Citrons from the South,
Sweet to tongue and sound to eye;
Come buy, come buy.'

Okay, you're probably thinking, maybe... it wouldn't be the first or last time that fruit have implied something carnal, but still it's a bit too subtle to really know, right? Well read on. (There's also audio of the poem at the link). What do you think?

Labels: , ,

Blogger raych said...

I wrote an essay for this poem on one of my final exams, pretty much because it freaked my shit out and I couldn't concentrate on any of the other poems.

Friday, 13 March, 2009  
Blogger Kailana said...

Christina Rossetti is one of my favourite poets. Goblin Market is the one that always come to mind when I think of her, though...

Friday, 13 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I like the cadence of this poem. It trips along nicely, when it's not trying to seduce me with fruit, that is.

Friday, 13 March, 2009  
Blogger Susan said...

I was just writing about poetry yesterday, and not sure who was reading any, and here you did a post on poetry! How lovely! Plus, i have some of Christina Rossetti's poetry too - I must be really innocent, because I took this poem at face value when I first read it a few years ago, and even tonight, rereading it on your blog, I still think it's about selling fruit! lol It could be about sexual favours, of course, but then I have to ask myself how it fits in with the title. I keep thinking about the rule of Faerie that you can't eat anything from there, so this poem is about fairies tempting - not likely, but neither is all the fruit they have to sell at once! Lovely post, John, and I am so happy to see other poets and poetry being discussed also.

Friday, 13 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Raych: There's no shortage of fodder for an essay, that's for sure.

Kailana: It certainly stands out.

Barbara: She was a master of cadence.

Susan: There's a bunch of us that blog about poetry ever Friday-- if you're interested, you should click on the "Poetry Friday" button at the top of this post.

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Reader's Diary #468- H.G. Wells- The War of The Worlds

The idea of "alternate reality" must be the single greatest contribution to sci-fi. No, Wells' The War of The Worlds didn't intend to be a book of alternate reality, but, as I'm sure many readers of dated sci-fi do, I used the idea of an alternate reality to help reconcile all the science that modern knowledge has revealed to be impossible or off-base. The whole premise of an intellectually superior life-form on Mars no longer holds up, but what if an alternative reality existed where such creatures did live on Mars? See? Everything's good again.

This helps illustrate a point about reading old sci-fi. It's like Prince's 1999. Remember when the song was a bleak prediction for the future, telling us to live life to the fullest?

Cuz they say two thousand zero zero party over,
Oops out of time
So tonight I'm gonna party like it's 1999


Now it's become more of an amusing nostalgia song. We remember the silly Y2K fears and the massive parties. Likewise, it's impossible not to read old sci-fi with an entirely different perspective than when it was first written.

So why do such books last? Is it merely a Nostradamus sort of fascination? Are we checking off things the author predicted right or wrong? Lasers? Check. Martian invasion? Wrong.

I think that's a part of the appeal, but I also think the best sci-fi has to have a good balance of imagined science with humanistic themes, because it's the themes that don't get old.

This is the strength of The War of The Worlds. I got bogged down early on with the heavy descriptors of the aliens and their fighting machines. However, when the entire population of London goes on the run, that's when I found things interesting. There's a great, albeit morbid, scene of a man being trampled by a carriage while reaching for a bag of money that has fallen to the ground. Even after his back has been broken and his legs have been rendered useless, he continues to clutch onto his money. That part is still believable. How can science can advance so rapidly, yet human beings so slowly? We're the ones behind the science.

The War of the Worlds is the story of a society coming to the realization that their way of life, their culture and even the simple remedial tasks that they've taken for granted, has the potential to come to an end. That's a fear as relevant today as in 1898, when this Wells classic was first published.

Labels: , , ,

Blogger Loni said...

I read The War of the Worlds a few years ago and thought it was fantastic. Wells' fiction may have been futuristic, but (from what I've read) it reflected how he saw his society at the time. The Time Machine (an excellent book and terrible movie) is another example.

Friday, 13 March, 2009  

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

The Great Wednesday Compare #3- Franz Kafka VERSUS Laura Ingalls Wilder


The winner of last week's Great Wednesday Compare (Franz Kafka Vs. Jean-Paul Sartre) with a final score of 4-3 was Franz Kafka.

Based on the single short story each that I've read (Kafka's "In The Penal Colony" and Sartre's "The Wall"), I'd have probably gone with Kafka last week, too. Though I totally acknowledge how unfair that is. Sartre is best known as a philosopher, of course, but I haven't read anything like that by him. In fact, my philosophy reading has been scant to say the least. After reading Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil, I've been sworn off philosophy for some time. Perhaps it's time to remedy that. Philosophy challenge anyone?

This week I'm keeping things a little simpler, reflecting back on the good ol' days. You'll also have three whole weeks to vote this time around. I'm not back from England until the 26th. However, in the meantime, I'd still check back here-- I've got a few posts written and scheduled ahead of time.

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (April 1st, 2009), and if you want your author to get more votes, feel free to promote them here or on your blog!

Who's better?

Labels: , ,

Blogger Allison said...

Happy Travels! Say hello to England for me. :)

I sent you something to your hotmail the other day...tunes for the journey!

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger Beth F said...

Travel safely. Childhood favorite wins for me. I could never vote against LIW.

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

I haven't been very familiar with the authors lately in the GWC, but I'm in now!
From the memories of little girls everywhere (in North AMerica): Laura Ingalls Wilder

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger Melanie said...

What a comparison! I'll say Laura Ingalls just because.

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger Nicola said...

This is a no-brainer, John!

Laura Ingalls Wilder

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger Book Psmith said...

Here's one I can vote for since I have read both:) Definitely Wilder!

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger Daibhin said...

LIW - She had such a profound affect on my childhood and love for books! She also preserved, in writing, a time and way of life for generations to come.

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kafka...

Laura Ingles Wilder is too bizarre for me...

-Myshkin.

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger C. B. James said...

I'm going to go with Kafka because he suffered more for his art.

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I spent far too much time reading Laura Ingalls Wilder as a child not to vote for her.

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Anonymous gypsysmom said...

Another vote for Laura. I'll take blizzards on the prairie over giant cockroaches any day.

I envy you your trip. Pick a primrose for me.

Wednesday, 11 March, 2009  
Blogger Bybee said...

Laura! Laura! Laura!

Thursday, 12 March, 2009  
Blogger Kate said...

And let me add my vote for Laura Ingalls Wilder.

Friday, 13 March, 2009  
Blogger PeachyTO said...

WILDER! Alllll the way.

Hope you're having a grand old time in England.

Cheerio

Friday, 13 March, 2009  
Blogger Susan said...

Happy travels, where are you going in England?

And sorry, it's Laura Ingalls Wilder all the way for me!

Friday, 13 March, 2009  
Blogger Sandra said...

Nothing against Wilder but Kafka it is for me.

Saturday, 14 March, 2009  
Anonymous Kathi D said...

FRANZ KAFKA!!! The man who said "Begin to see who you are, instead of calculating what is to become of you."
Definitely. Kafka.

Wednesday, 18 March, 2009  
Blogger Historia said...

Laura Ingalls Wilder anytime!!!!

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Reader's Diary #467- Rutu Modan: Exit Wounds

Exit Wounds by Rutu Modan marks my sixth and final book for the Graphic Novel Challenge. My reading list consisted of:

1. It's A Good Life If You Don't Weaken- Seth
2. Absolute Sandman, Vol. 1- Neil Gaiman
3. Louis Riel: A Comic Biography by Chester Brown
4. Persepolis- Marjane Satrapi
5. Epileptic- David B
6. Exit Wounds- Rutu Modan

I'd like to say I ended the Graphic Novel Challenge on a higher note, but unfortunately Exit Wounds was my least favourite of the lot.

I'll start with the art work since most of my opinions in that area come down to personal preference. Though Modan uses red from time to time (as on the cover), the book is heavy on pastels. I don't like pastels. I feel like I should state some macho reason for this like "no self-respecting male likes pastels" but I assure you that's not it. They're just not dramatic enough. Even black and white seems bolder. Plus, while occasionally Modan plays with the lighting to indicate the time of day and so on, it's completely void of shading and shadows. Everything comes across as flat. The explosion on the cover is very misleading. The pastels, the uniform colouring, and the Tintin influenced simplicity, were not a good combination. It reminded me of the illustrations found on airplane emergency instructions.

But if the artwork was underwhelming at least it matched the story. Set in modern day Tel Aviv, it is the story of Koby Franco who sets out with a woman named Numi to learn whether or not an identified body, a suicide bombing victim, is really his estranged father. Sounds exciting, doesn't it? Unfortunately, it's as anti-climactic as they come.

Looking at the graphic novels above, I was a little perplexed why I'd like Seth's book and not this one, when it too could be described as anti-climactic. The only thing I could come up with was that Seth didn't promise as much. I knew from the get go that it wasn't going to be heavy in the plot department, so I settled into it all nice and cozy like. With Modan's talk of suicide bombings and explosions on the cover, I felt like I'd been promised more than she ever delivered.

Labels: , , ,

Blogger Dale said...

Thanks for the review, I'd wondered about this book and now I know!

Friday, 13 March, 2009  

Monday, March 09, 2009

Reader's Diary #466- Arthur Conan Doyle: The Sealed Room

If you've noticed things getting a little British around here in recent posts, it's because next Sunday I've off to the the U.K. or Great Britain or England or whatever she wants to be called these days. I'm pretty excited and have gotten my offensive cockney accent down just roight.
This week I'm in with an Arthur Conan Doyle tale. I discovered, after reading it, that Doyle was actually a Scot. Close enough (I can get away with saying this, because I'm not visiting Scotland this time around). Besides, the story is set in London and Doyle eventually moved there anyway, so it's all good.

I picked "The Sealed Room" pretty much at random and wrongly assumed it was to be a Sherlock Holmes tale. Instead it turned out to be about a lawyer named Frank Alder and his encounter with the young Felix Stanniford, a man unable to upkeep the mansion that has been left to him, but more importantly, unable to open a mysterious door at the end of a hall. It had been sealed over with wax and Felix was specifically instructed not to open it until his 21st birthday.

While it definitely has a mysterious air about it, it is not solved in the manner of a typical mystery story. We have to be content to wait until Felix actually turns 21 (which he does by the end of the story) instead of relying on powers of deduction. With the age old premise of being scared by the unknown behind a closed door (wasn't Let's Make A Deal absolutely terrifying?), "The Sealed Room" would be more accurately called a horror story than a mystery.

While it's not really scary by today's standards, and while it is somewhat predictable, there are parts of the writing that I enjoyed. I especially liked how the opening paragraph took on added significance at the end of the story.

Have you written a post for Short Story Monday? If so, please leave your link below:

Labels: , ,

Blogger Allison said...

Great news about England! Where about are you headed? Say Hi to Newcastle for me. :)

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger Teddy Rose said...

I'm having to sit out of a few Short Story Mondays because I'm behind in my reading and am participating in another blog tour on March 17th, for Galway Bay.

Have a wonderful time on your trip John! I want to hear all about it upon your return.

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger JoAnn said...

This is my first Short Story Monday...hope I did the link correctly. Thanks for hosting and enjoy your trip!

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger Book Psmith said...

I am too jealous...have a great time in the UK. The closest I've been was a nightmarish 10 hours waiting out a storm at Heathrow to continue on to Amsterdam. I spent quite a bit of time in the bookstore:) The Sealed Room sounds good...I like stories that are 'not really scary by today's standards', so I'll have to check it out.

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger GeraniumCat said...

"the U.K. or Great Britain or England or whatever she wants to be called these days"...

Could I just point out that the UK, Great Britain or England are not synonymous? England?!! We Scots are prone to take offence, and the Welsh and Irish are not far behind as a rule!

Have a good time when you get to England! but I don't recommend the cod cockney if you get to Scotland.

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Allison: We're going to London, Lowestoft, Birmingham, Stratford and of course, Mutford.

Teddy: Have a fun blog tour!

JoAnn: You did it right.

Geranium: I actually did know that England and the U.K. are not synonymous. I still don't know where Great Britain fits into the equation though. Sorry if I caused any offense! I'm sorry to say we won't make it to Scotland this time around. We desperately wanted to, but we sort of built the trip around visiting my ancestral grounds, and can't fit it in this time. Years ago I had booked us a trip to Scotland but ended up refunding the tickets. We weren't in a financial spot where we could afford it at the time, but I'll make it there someday.

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I hope you get feted royally in Mutford, get the choicest pick of the sheep head and such.

I am going to save this short story for next Monday, so I don't miss you as badly.

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Barbara: No need for that. Through the magic of scheduled posting, I may just have a short story post up next week anyway.

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Anonymous Alisa said...

How embarrassing. I don't think I even knew Doyle wrote non-Holmes stories. Learn something new everyday...

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger GeraniumCat said...

John, not really offended (got to start using those smilies). Great Britain is England, Scotland and Wales, whereas UK includes Northern Ireland. When I first visited Canada and people asked where I was from I started out by saying "the UK" but no-one seemed to know where I was talking about - it's still my preferred term however, "Great" Britain makes me truculent. Who decided it was great? All hubris, if you ask me!

If you're in Oxford at the end of the month, I'm the one shepherding the flock of Canadians and looking harassed.

Tuesday, 10 March, 2009  

Sunday, March 08, 2009

And the winner is...

Pooker! Congrats to Pooker who takes away a copy of Isabelle Lafonta and Barroux's Mikissuk's Secret by entering the 2nd Canadian Book Challenge 8th update contest.

I'm not sure if I've ever explained how I pick my winners, but if anyone's curious: I assign all the entries a number based on the order in which it was received. Then I use a customized random number generator that allows me to set the upper and lower limits. Think of it as a high-tech hat.

Anyway, congrats to Pooker!

Labels: , , , ,

Anonymous Pooker said...

Awww, thanks John! I'm tickled to receive this book. Love your high tech hat! It's sure been nice to me.

BTW: Once I've had a chance to read and admire the book, it will go to a BookCrossing shelf in one of our local schools. So some lucky child will ultimately be able to take it home as their very own.

Sunday, 08 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

Congratulations Pooker!
A BookCrossing shelf at school, what a great idea... :)

Sunday, 08 March, 2009  
Blogger Teddy Rose said...

Congrats Pooker!

Monday, 09 March, 2009  

Saturday, March 07, 2009

Saturday Word Play- Lord of the Rings Rebus



Today's Saturday Word Play features rebus, or picture puzzles. Figure out what the picture is, add or subtract the letters specified to spell characters from J.R.R. Tolkien's classic Lord of the Rings. For instance, If I gave you this picture:

you'd figure out that "afro"-a= fro, "doe"-e= do, and you'd combine them to get "Frodo."

As always, feel free to do all ten at home, but only answer one in the comment section. That way, 10 people can play along.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Labels: , , ,

Blogger Sandra said...

# 10 is Bilbo. Frodo is the only other one I got. It's my dog's name and although I read The Hobbit many years ago, I never read any other Tolkein. Not my cup of tea. But this should be a fun one for LOR readers.

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger claire said...

#3 Legolas.

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger Beth F said...

I think 9 is Gandalf.

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger Charlotte Ashley said...

I'll take %6, Gimli!

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

#5 is Sauron!

Excellent word play puzzle this week! Pictures are easier on my brain first thing in the morning.

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Anonymous pooker said...

#8 is Galadriel

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger Wanda said...

#1 is Samwise

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Good job everyone! That leaves only 2, 4, and 7.

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

#4 is Gollum

gloria.B.

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

p.s.
cute bum. yours? :)

-gloria.B.

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger Historia said...

Number 7 is Aragorn

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger Historia said...

This is the entire list - except for number 2

#1 Samwise
#3 Legolas
#4 is Gollum
#5 is Sauron
#6, Gimli
#7 is Aragorn
#8 is Galadriel
#9 is Gandalf
# 10 is Bilbo

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Anonymous gypsysmom said...

Is #2 Saruman?

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Gypsysmom: That's correct. And that makes all 10 answers, in record time.

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger John Mutford said...

And no, it's not my bum!

Saturday, 07 March, 2009  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

It's just as well that google reader only posted you today, Monday, because I wouldn't have got any of those.
Do you make all these up? Very impressive.

Have a great trip! I think it's like the Maritimes and Atlantic Canada - when you live here, you definitely know the difference, but it all looks the same from far away.

Monday, 09 March, 2009  
Blogger Historia said...

That number 2 really had me stumped. I would never have though of Search and Rescue - SAR

I was thinking
heli, no,
copter, no,
chopper, no,

Please do more of those picture puzzles. I like them.

Tuesday, 17 March, 2009